Thursday, January 14, 2016

The Ballads of Network-Internet-Cable

So here's the thing.

I should really be aware of this kind of thing last year, or even 2 or 3 years ago. 2 years ago, I was bragging that cable took over network TV that easy. Then, a year ago and up until now, Netflix and Amazon never cease to amaze us with their innovations. 

After I saw the announcement of Golden Globe Awards last week, it got me thinking too loud. What about Emmys then? 

This year, Mozart in The Jungle took over the best comedy series and Mr. Robot got the best drama series. Both came from internet based show and cable. I know GGA is always having kind of anomaly for TV category, but still. GGA always be the benchmark for the upcoming Emmys. Then, what's left for network TV then?

I remember perfectly clear at year of 06 when The Office won easily over Curb Your Enthusiasm and 24 got so much recognition instead of The Sopranos. I mean, TV was a real deal back then. Take a look at 24, the very best interpretation of drama series with a very great concept. Nothing can beat the idea of making tv show like 24 did. 

ER, SNL, and Cheers still hold the most nominations on Primetime Emmy Awards. It's not because of, there's no cable and Netflix back then. For me it's about sincerity you put inside the show. In retrospect thought, ER was just a medical tv show where the story is all about patient who came around ER with their diseases and the talented doctors came to rescue them, that's it. The very good news is, ER have 194 noms in total, just because of that simple story.  

I don't hate Netflix or Cable show. I'm proudly to say that I'm a House of Cards biggest fans and Homeland's freak. I love them both equally. Back then, people move to cable, cause cable gave us the better story, real story, honest story cause practically they don't care about the ratings and the censorship. You could actually found a very naked men at HBO show. As time goes by, Netflix and later Amazon hacked into our life with bunch of vulgar content which the audiences loves too much. I'm not saying about nudity or nakedness and un-awkward sex in this part, I mean, internet based tv show us the very good story about american undercover side like LGBT theme or something taboo, into a very great tv show. Which we found more interesting and refreshing.

The thing is, network tv show are always up for ratings, viewers, censorship and millions other things. Through the many boundaries, network tv couldn't present the audiences what they really want. CBS for example. CBS know too much that Americans love to see crime based, procedural, court drama, and action show. So, in order to fulfill that market's needs, they tend to produce show like CSI, then make it CSI into 3 different franchise, as we know they did to NCIS too. Then they create bunch of procedural/police/crime drama all over again. Yeah, the ratings are very very very good. NCIS and NCIS: LA are always position themselves in number 2 or 3 (of course NBC still own the Sunday Night Football as the number 1 rating in USA) in top tv ratings. I mean, seriously, this show never got recognition for Emmy and other awards, yet they're still great at ratings. 

Meanwhile, NBC, a very compassionate network who work really hard to create some different stories for tv show, got nothing on ratings since FRIENDS ended up their show in 2004. Also at that year, ER dropped its rating because season 10 was really transitioning for ER. NBC always produce the very best tv show. We can take a look back at Frasier, Cheers, 30 Rock, The Office and  how they took so many awards because of it. They are a very award-ish shows but sadly, they got no numbers on ratings. They always ended up canceled by the network. How sad. I just can not imagine, how NBC will ever survive with ratings? One good thing about NBC is they tried so hard to keep producing a good quality comedy and drama. And it's not procedural. It is so obvious that NBC is really trying to get audiences's heart again just like 80s and 90s. Great ratings and also great quality because back then their show were always picked up for the awards thingy. 

And now, with the advent of cable and internet, what's left for network TV? what's left for NBC? Why bother to do Emmy on the CBS, NBC, ABC, and Fox if there's no noms from network tv in the future? 

I like too see more show like 30 Rock got pick up by NBC, it's not about the ratings, it's the quality. We've seen how NBC took a large amount of Emmys because of their quality not the ratings. Again, we should learn something from Netflix and cable, they did 13 to 15 episodes even maybe 6 episodes with total greatness on each episodes not the 20-24 episodes with the ballads of "highest rating" competition. Again, that was why they took home many awards nowadays. 

The Emmys itself should also give us the basic interpretation for tv show again. I mean, the world is changing. Why do we say Emmys is an award for recognizing work on tv while we are not watching television anymore. Isn't it a little bit weird? If so, then there will be no noms left for network tv to meets Emmys standard then.  Because now, we can compare network and internet or cable show. Network has its own limitation aside from finding a large viewers.

Moreover, I don't care about the how much award they got, I really like to see a seriousness on network tv show to gain our trust into them again. Us, used to spend a lot on Seinfeld, and now we move on to Veep cause Julia Louis Dreyfuss is much better and rude-r, and realistic AF as VP there. 

That's it.
I don't really know why am I talking about this tonight.
I guess I'm too concern.
Goodluck, Network.
See you on the next award to fight for Oustanding Drama Series. 

No comments:

Post a Comment